Saturday, January 19, 2008

Greatness and Dead Limbs

For a work to be great, it cannot be merely the result of a moment's chance, but requires much skill and effort, the pouring out of one's very self into the making of it. This is especially true of a book, and in particular the novel where it is the writer's experience that makes the characters living and real and the writer's imagination that makes the story vivid and unique.

Yet to say that the writer must pour his very self into his work is by no means exaggeration or mere poeticism, but truth.

It is rather as if one were to grow an extra limb—an arm let us say for example's sake—and naturally to accomplish such a feat (leaving aside its practical if not its utter impossibility) one must exert all his strength and energy into it, as if it could be done by strength of will alone. At first it would be a mere protuberance, but gradually it would begin to take on a resemblance to the other arms. Thus, growing slowly, it would at last be complete. (That would be the point at which one's friends would begin to ask what it felt like to have three arms. Of course the response would disappoint them, for there would have been no abrupt transition from two to three, but rather a gradual growing accustomed to it until the usage of three arms was as natural as had been two.)

Then comes the time to remove the limb. It was not made to become part of the body and function as a third arm, but as a work of art. (My analogy begins to grow stranger.) Thus one would then remove the arm, leaving behind an open wound, though hidden to all the world.

Rather than merely letting the limb remain lying about to admire, one must decide to show it to his friends and acquaintances. (And, yes, here my analogy grows very strange indeed.) Without this step, one would never notice all the imperfections in it, from the misplaced wrinkle on a knuckle to a darkened fingernail to the malformed elbow.

Either then, or after a time of rest, it comes time to reattach the arm, and work out those imperfections, striving once again to make an arm as perfect as those two already at his sides, which grew there without any effort on his part. Sometimes he must begin all over again with only the idea in his mind of what worked and what did not. For the intent is not merely to make an arm of sorts, but to make such an arm that all would recognize it as an arm just like any other arm.

Again the finished arm must be removed. This time it is more difficult and leaves a larger wound behind, for the more perfect it is, the more greatly does it become attached. This might happen a number of times, but all is aimed toward the final goal of sharing it with the whole world that they might learn from it by examining it.

Thus is the analogy finished, at least insofar as is my regard for it. The truths of the matter might be better expressed in other ways, but only in ways less palpable.

It is this pouring out of one's soul into his work that is both a toll upon his strength and yet brings joy unmeasurable; it is both a hardship and a testing of one's strength and will, and also a fulfillment. Perhaps, too, it is why writers are known for their tendency toward insanity and suchlike.

4 comments:

Jkarofwild said...

Is that to say that a perfectly written arm, a truly and actually perfect story, would be impossible to detach? I like that possibility. It means that the perfect story won't be recognized until you're dead. And I think that's the only time that I wouldn't mind being famous.

Unknown said...

Here's another thought: Your stories never actually leave you, so the analogy is imperfect. No one can ever truly understand what you write aside from thine own selvesy. Other people can come to new, sometimes different, and occasionally shocking, and quite possible remarkable, conclusions about it. But it, this story, is part of you, and always will be part of you.

Unless you do, really, go insane. Or you get amnesia. Or something.

So the analogy is imperfect, because stories are extensions of your intellect and perspective into the world at large.

But your analogy is really pretty cool. You should turn it into a story. Maybe there are a group of individuals--mutants, or something--who have the job of growing new limbs for soldiers who get theirs torn off. You could get really cool, creepy, gorgeous, wonderous, sickening, stark, beautiful, and thought-provoking with that.

An related aside: I keep thinking into this fantasy world to be made up, where the intangible has grievous effect on the tangible. It started with the idea of forgiveness. Say you were badly slighted, or injured, or something. What happens in this world is now you and the injuring party are connected, for better or worse, and it is on the injuring party's head to repent, and until he does you two have a forced relationship, of a kind which I have not determined. Then, say, the repentence takes place. Now it is on you to forgive. You still have a connection, but the tables are turned, and the injuring party is now benefitting.

When the forgiveness takes place, the connection is broken. No more mystical relationship.

It could be expanded with this story thing. Stories, poems, and such, would be pieces of your intellect--your mind--spread all over the world, so essentially you are all over the world. But if the connection is somehow broken--psychosis, brain damage, amnesia--the connections are broken, and your power is diminished.

This is going to be a freaking awesome world.

Nickel Halfwise said...

That is an interesting idea. Impossible of course though, as nothing here could be perfect, but a wonderful theoretical possibility.

----------

You know about phantom limb pain, right? Well, just as your stories never leave you, neither do your limbs apparently, even if they do physically. Really it is not the living, growing physical form of the story that remains with you either, which was the point I was trying to make. I should have added that.

Actually as I was writing that I was thinking it would make a good story idea, something along the same lines as what you said.
I was originally thinking of doing something more closely approximately the reality, such as it being a part of your spirit spread through the world, but then I thought of this idea and it was easier to explain.

I like that idea of yours. I think I would be inclined to go the opposite direction with it. I mean, the idea of you and the injuring party being connected seems right, but I don't know about it being dissolved by forgiveness. Just based on our world--or at least my theoretical, fantastical speculations about the spiritual elements--I would say that the forgiveness would bind them together more strongly, but differently. What happens if someone forgives before the other person has repented? Is this possible? The way I might go with it would be to have the forgiveness create the bond that put it on the injuring party to repent. Then with the injuring party repented, it would make the connection invisible, or whatever equivalent went with the type of connection you decide. Anyway, those are my thoughts, for what they’re worth.

I had this other idea, kind of similar to yours, except about intuition. See, people think that intuition is the strangest thing and sometimes think you just have to trust it but cannot explain it, and I think if they only had a proper understanding of the relation of our bodies and souls, then it would make perfect sense. So what I was thinking of doing was exploring that intuitive feeling about people and events through a fantasy world.

Jkarofwild said...

That reminds me of a 'story' idea I had. More a concept, really. Something about souls. I think I have it written down somewhere.